The Most/Recent Articles

Showing posts with label Featured. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Featured. Show all posts

Jim Goodnight Faces the Biggest Challenge in SAS History as AI Reshapes Enterprise Software



How SAS Founder Jim Goodnight Is Reinventing A Billion-Dollar Analytics Empire For The AI Era

For decades, SAS operated as one of the most quietly successful software companies in the world. Built outside Silicon Valley’s traditional spotlight, the analytics powerhouse generated billions in revenue while maintaining a business model centered on profitability, enterprise loyalty and long-term operational discipline.

Now, as artificial intelligence rapidly reshapes the global technology sector, founder Jim Goodnight faces perhaps the most consequential transformation in the company’s history. The rise of generative AI and machine learning platforms is forcing even established analytics leaders to rethink how they compete in a market increasingly defined by automation, cloud infrastructure and intelligent decision-making systems.

A Rare Technology Success Story Built On Stability

Unlike many technology firms that prioritized aggressive expansion over sustainable operations, SAS built its reputation through consistency. The company became a dominant force in enterprise analytics by focusing heavily on industries such as healthcare, finance, government and manufacturing, sectors where data reliability and long-term relationships matter deeply.

Under Goodnight’s leadership, SAS also gained recognition for its unconventional corporate culture. Employee retention, workplace flexibility and research-driven innovation became central pillars of the company’s operational philosophy long before such strategies became mainstream across the technology industry.

That stability helped SAS remain privately held while many competitors pursued public markets and rapid acquisition strategies. Yet the AI revolution is now challenging the traditional strengths that once insulated the company from disruption.

Artificial Intelligence Is Reshaping Enterprise Analytics

The rapid acceleration of AI technologies has fundamentally altered expectations surrounding enterprise software. Businesses increasingly demand platforms capable of automating predictive analysis, generating real-time insights and integrating conversational AI directly into operational workflows.

For legacy analytics firms, the challenge extends beyond adding AI features. The larger issue involves redefining entire product ecosystems around faster, more adaptive intelligence systems capable of competing with cloud-native AI platforms.

SAS has responded by increasing investment in AI infrastructure, cloud-based solutions and industry-specific intelligent analytics tools. The company’s long history in advanced data science gives it technical credibility, but the competitive landscape now moves at a dramatically faster pace than traditional enterprise software cycles once allowed.

The Pressure Facing Established Technology Companies

Goodnight’s situation reflects a broader reality confronting many mature technology firms. Companies that once dominated through specialization and operational stability must now adapt to an environment driven by rapid experimentation and evolving AI capabilities.

The shift is particularly significant because generative AI has accelerated expectations across nearly every industry. Clients increasingly expect software platforms not only to analyze data but to interpret, predict and automate strategic decision-making processes with minimal human intervention.

This transformation creates enormous opportunity, but also significant pressure for firms built during earlier phases of enterprise computing. Legacy systems, slower development structures and long-established business models can become vulnerabilities in a market increasingly rewarding speed and flexibility.

Why SAS Still Holds Strategic Advantages

Despite the disruption, SAS retains several critical strengths that could support its reinvention. The company maintains deep institutional relationships with highly regulated industries where trust, compliance and data integrity remain essential competitive advantages.

Its decades of experience handling complex enterprise analytics also provide a foundation many newer AI companies still lack. While startup competitors may move faster, SAS benefits from a long-established reputation among organizations managing sensitive operational data.

Additionally, the company’s private ownership structure may allow for more strategic long-term adaptation without the quarterly earnings pressures facing publicly traded rivals.

The Reinvention Of An Analytics Giant

Jim Goodnight built SAS into one of the software industry’s most enduring profitability machines through patience, operational focus and deep technical expertise. The AI era now demands a different kind of leadership challenge, one centered not on preserving stability alone, but on navigating accelerated technological transformation without sacrificing the company’s foundational strengths.

The outcome will likely determine whether SAS evolves into a modern AI-driven enterprise platform or risks losing relevance in one of the most competitive periods the technology sector has ever experienced.

For established software companies across the industry, the message is becoming increasingly clear: artificial intelligence is no longer an adjacent innovation strategy. It is the market itself.

Apple to Pay $250 Million to Settle Misleading Advertising Lawsuit Over Its AI Features

Apple agrees to pay 250 million dollars to settle a class action lawsuit in the United States over allegedly misleading advertising related to Apple Intelligence and AI features on iPhone 15 and iPhone 16 devices.
The technology company reached a major legal settlement tied to marketing claims surrounding Apple Intelligence and AI-powered Siri capabilities.

Apple has agreed to pay 250 million dollars to settle a class action lawsuit in the United States accusing the company of misleading advertising related to artificial intelligence features promoted for the iPhone 15 and iPhone 16 lineup.

The lawsuit was filed in federal court in San Francisco and alleged that the company created a misleading impression regarding the immediate availability and actual performance of Apple Intelligence, Apple’s artificial intelligence platform.

According to the plaintiffs, Apple’s marketing campaigns encouraged millions of consumers to purchase new devices under the expectation that they would gain access to an advanced AI-powered version of Siri, features that ultimately did not arrive within the promised timeframe.

Users Could Receive Financial Compensation


The settlement still requires preliminary approval from a federal judge, but it includes compensation for customers in the United States who purchased iPhone 16 models or Pro versions of the iPhone 15 between June 10, 2024, and March 29, 2025.

Court documents indicate that eligible customers could receive between 25 and 95 dollars per device, depending on the total number of claims submitted during the settlement process.

Industry reports estimate that the agreement covers approximately 37 million devices sold across the United States, making it one of the most significant out-of-court settlements in Apple’s recent history.

Apple Denies Wrongdoing

Despite the size of the settlement, Apple has not admitted any legal wrongdoing or deceptive practices. The company maintains that since launching Apple Intelligence, it has introduced multiple AI-powered tools and improvements.

Among the features highlighted by Apple are real-time translation tools known as Live Translations, along with new visual intelligence capabilities and expanded AI integrations within the iOS ecosystem.

Apple also argues that it continues developing new AI-driven experiences intended to strengthen Siri’s capabilities and compete more aggressively in the rapidly expanding generative AI market.

Apple Faces Growing Pressure in the AI Race


Over the past several years, Apple has faced criticism for moving more slowly than competitors in the development of generative artificial intelligence technologies.

Companies such as Google and Samsung have expanded their lead with devices that integrate advanced AI features, smarter virtual assistants, and productivity-focused automation tools.

Apple officially introduced Apple Intelligence during its 2024 Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC), unveiling a new generation of features designed to transform Siri and compete with platforms like ChatGPT.

However, several of the most ambitious tools announced during the event experienced major delays, raising concerns among consumers, investors, and technology analysts.

Upcoming WWDC Event Will Be Closely Watched

The legal settlement becomes public only weeks before Apple’s next annual developer conference, scheduled for June 8.

Analysts expect the company to unveil a more advanced Siri upgrade and additional AI-powered capabilities aimed at competing directly with the industry’s leading artificial intelligence platforms.

Pressure on Apple continues to grow as global adoption of generative AI tools accelerates, making the future of Apple Intelligence one of the company’s most important strategic priorities.

Elon Musk vs. OpenAI: The Trial That Could Redefine Artificial Intelligence, Nonprofit Ethics, and the Future of Tech Power

Elon Musk testifying in OpenAI trial over AI surpassing human intelligence by 2026


In a courtroom in Oakland, California, the most consequential legal battle in the history of artificial intelligence officially began. On Tuesday, Elon Musk took the stand in U.S. District Court, testifying in his own lawsuit against OpenAI, its CEO Sam Altman, and tech titan Microsoft — a case that has the potential to fundamentally alter the trajectory of AI development, the ethics of nonprofit-to-profit transitions, and the very definition of who controls the world's most powerful emerging technology.

What made the opening day particularly striking was not just the legal maneuvering or the billions of dollars at stake. It was a single, quietly staggering remark Musk delivered to the jury: that artificial intelligence could surpass human intelligence as soon as next year.

A Warning From the Stand: AI Smarter Than Humans by 2026

Musk used his time before the jury not merely to litigate grievances, but to frame a broader civilizational question. Speaking about the accelerating pace of technological change, he told jurors he believes AI will become "smarter than any human" within the near term — potentially by 2026 — and stressed that the critical window for instilling values into these systems is rapidly closing.

The analogy he reached for was intimate and deeply human: raising a child. A parent, Musk explained, can shape a child's character and values in its formative years, but once that child matures and surpasses the parent in capability, control becomes impossible. The same principle, he argued, applies to artificial intelligence. "When the child grows up, you can't control that child," he said — a remark that resonated far beyond the courtroom walls.

What Musk was gesturing at is what researchers call artificial general intelligence, or AGI — a form of AI that can perform any intellectual task a human can, and then some. In Musk's telling, the race to reach AGI is already underway, and the question of what values are baked into these systems before that threshold is crossed is not merely philosophical. It is, he argued, existential.

The Origins of OpenAI and an Alleged Betrayal of Mission

To understand why Musk filed this lawsuit — and why the legal community and the tech world are watching it with such intensity — one has to return to 2015, when Musk and Altman co-founded OpenAI alongside a cohort of prominent Silicon Valley figures. The founding vision was explicit and idealistic: to develop artificial intelligence "for the benefit of humanity as a whole, unconstrained by a need to generate financial return."

Musk testified that he invested in OpenAI specifically because of that mission. He said he supported a limited for-profit structure only insofar as it would fund research — never as an end in itself. The nonprofit mission, in his view, was always meant to remain the north star, immune to commercial pressures and corporate interests.

What followed, according to Musk, was a slow but unmistakable drift. He departed the company in 2018 amid internal disagreements, and in the years that followed, OpenAI launched ChatGPT, secured billions in funding from Microsoft, and restructured itself into a commercial hybrid — a move Musk has consistently characterized as a fundamental betrayal of its original purpose. "OpenAI was created as an open source, non-profit company to serve as a counterweight to Google," Musk posted on X just days before the trial began. "Now it has become a closed source, maximum-profit company effectively controlled by Microsoft. Not what I intended at all."

Altman's Response and the Competing Narrative

OpenAI and Altman have offered a sharply different account. The company has called Musk's lawsuit "baseless" and accused him of conducting a "campaign of harassment" driven not by principle, but by competitive jealousy. On a dedicated webpage titled "The Truth About Elon Musk and OpenAI," the company alleges that Musk himself once supported transitioning OpenAI into a for-profit entity, and that his current legal crusade is motivated by his own rival AI venture, xAI — which merged with his aerospace company SpaceX earlier this year.

Altman, who is also expected to spend significant time on the witness stand, told The New York Times in 2023 that the rift between himself and Musk reflects the kind of bitter disagreements that arise between people who were once closely aligned. "There is disagreement, mistrust, egos," he said. "The closer people are to being pointed in the same direction, the more contentious the disagreements are."

What Is Actually at Stake — Financially and Structurally

The financial dimensions of this trial are staggering. Musk is seeking more than $134 billion in damages from OpenAI — funds that, notably, would flow to OpenAI's nonprofit arm rather than to Musk personally — as well as damages from Microsoft, which he alleges played a central role in the company's commercial transformation. He is also pushing for the removal of both Altman and co-founder Greg Brockman from their leadership positions, and for OpenAI to revert to a pure nonprofit structure.

Microsoft has denied the allegations. OpenAI, meanwhile, has painted the lawsuit as little more than a competitive weapon wielded by a billionaire who walked away from the company and is now trying to destabilize a rival.

Beyond the monetary figures, the structural implications may be even more significant. Professor Julia Powles, Executive Director of the UCLA Institute for Technology Law and Policy, has noted that if Musk prevails, "structural reform" of OpenAI is theoretically on the table — including leadership changes, a shift in its nonprofit-versus-for-profit architecture, or potentially even a breakup of the company itself.

The Microsoft Dimension and OpenAI's IPO Ambitions

The timing of this trial could not be more consequential for OpenAI's corporate ambitions. The company is widely expected to pursue an initial public offering later this year — a milestone that a costly, high-profile legal defeat, or even prolonged reputational damage, could meaningfully complicate. Microsoft, whose partnership with OpenAI has been central to the company's commercial expansion, is also a named defendant, adding another layer of complexity to an already fraught situation.

Musk's attorney, Steven Molo, framed the case in unambiguous moral terms. "This is a case of simple right and wrong," he told Newsweek. "We're championing right." His client, he added, hoped to "return OpenAI to its charitable mission of developing safe, open-source AI for the benefit of humanity unconstrained by a need to generate profits."

A Three-Week Trial With Consequences That Could Last Decades

The trial is expected to run approximately three weeks. Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers has indicated that if OpenAI is found liable, a separate phase focused on potential remedies will begin around May 18. Among the witnesses expected to take the stand are Altman, Brockman, and Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella — a lineup that ensures the trial will continue to command global attention.

What makes this moment genuinely extraordinary is that it sits at the intersection of technology, ethics, law, and culture in a way that few legal proceedings ever have. The questions being argued in an Oakland courtroom — Who owns the future of AI? What obligations do its creators carry? Can a nonprofit's founding ideals survive contact with the commercial realities of Silicon Valley? — are questions that extend far beyond this particular case.

As Musk himself framed it, the technology being debated is not merely a product. It is, in his words, something approaching consciousness — a new kind of intelligence that humanity will soon be unable to contain, regardless of what any court decides. Whether or not a jury ultimately agrees with his legal arguments, the deeper question he raised on Tuesday will continue to define the conversation around artificial intelligence for years to come: Are we instilling the right values in AI before it's too late to do so?

For those who believe the answer to that question matters — and for those who believe the institutions shaping AI must be held accountable to the values they were built on — this trial is not just a business dispute. It is a reckoning.

Jonas Lauwiner: The Last King

The man who found the one gap the modern world forgot to close and built an empire from it.


Jonas Lauwiner Swiss land claim empire — the man who legally acquired 149 parcels and 83 roads across nine Swiss cantons using Article 658 of the Swiss Civil Code
Image Source: King Jonas I of Lauwiner

Written by Karol Thiessen

There is a moment in the history of every great discovery when someone looks at exactly the same thing everyone else has been looking at for years and sees something entirely different.

Not because they have more information. Not because they have more money, more connections, or a better title. But because they asked the right question at the exact moment no one else had the patience to ask it.

Jonas Lauwiner asked that question one afternoon, reviewing land registry records in Switzerland. A question that seemed almost ridiculous, almost obvious and yet one no one had ever followed to its final consequence:

How much land in this country belongs to no one?

The answer changed his life. And, in the process, forced one of the most sophisticated legal systems in the world to rewrite itself.

The Swiss Civil Code contains 977 articles. The world might know three. Lauwiner found Article 658 — an almost invisible provision stating that any citizen can legally claim, without paying a single franc, any officially registered parcel with no owner. Roads abandoned by failed developers. Streambeds no one ever claimed. Strips of forest left orphaned in disputed inheritances. Land that exists on maps but has long ceased to exist in anyone’s awareness.

They were there. Scattered across nine cantons of the most orderly country in Europe. Waiting, in silence, for someone curious enough to go looking.

He was the only one who did.

He went through the records canton by canton, with the precision of someone not searching for a shortcut, but building something. He applied. Waited. Signed. Started again. And while municipalities looked the other way — because those lands generated no taxes, no conflicts, no urgency — Lauwiner quietly accumulated what they had chosen to ignore.

By 2026, the result was impossible to overlook: 149 parcels, 83 roads, 114,000 square meters of territory spread across nine Swiss cantons. All legal. All registered in his name. All built without an enormous monetary investment, without inherited connections; with nothing but the determination to read what no one else had read carefully enough.

Residents of quiet suburban developments discovered, without warning, that the road they used every morning to take their children to school belonged to a stranger. Municipalities tried to reverse the acquisitions. The law said they couldn’t. A lawyer sued him for abuse of the system. The judge dismissed the case.
Because Lauwiner had abused nothing. He had done exactly what the law allowed. He had simply done it better, more systematically and with more conviction than anyone who had ever encountered that law before.

We live in an era where everything is already claimed. Every meter of habitable land has an owner, a deed, a mortgage, and layers of bureaucracy on top. The great empires of this century have been built through acquisition — investment funds and PE firms buying entire city blocks, corporations owning more land than small nations. The idea that someone could still “discover” land — find something that belonged to no one and make it their own — feels, in 2026, not just unlikely, but impossible.

Lauwiner found the exception. And he used it completely.

“I do it digitally and without bloodshed,” he said, comparing his acquisitions to a military campaign. He is right about something worth pausing on: conquerors of the past needed armies, horses, gunpowder. He needed patience, a land registry database, and the willingness to take seriously a question everyone else dismissed as too obvious to answer.

In 2019, in the middle of all this, he walked into a 15th-century church in the heart of Bern and crowned himself king. His “palace” is a converted industrial factory, with an armored vehicle at the entrance. He mints his own currency. He has his own legion. He charges for passage on his roads and negotiates with municipalities as an equal — sometimes with generosity, sometimes with the calculated coldness of someone who knows exactly what his assets are worth.

Swiss municipalities are already changing their laws so that no one else can do what he did.

That is perhaps the most honest recognition a system can give someone: not an award, not applause, but the urgency to close the door he was the only one to see open.

There is a question Jonas Lauwiner has left hanging over Switzerland — the same question the great cartographers left when they reached the edge of their maps and decided to keep drawing:

What else is out there that no one has claimed yet?

He already knows the answer.

And in the saturated, hyper-connected world of 2026, it remains exactly what it has always been:

An act of genius.

Cambridge Audio Unveils Melomania A100: Hi-Fi Sound Meets Smart Features in New Flagship Earbuds

Cambridge Audio Unveils Melonmania A100


Cambridge Audio Unveils Melomania A100: Hi-Fi Sound Meets Smart Features in New Flagship Earbuds

Cambridge Audio, the revered British brand with a legacy in audiophile-grade hardware since 1968, has just announced the Melomania A100—its most advanced wireless earbuds to date. Combining decades of high-fidelity expertise with modern tech, the A100 are engineered to deliver what the brand calls its “award-winning signature sound” in a sleek, compact, and comfortable form factor.

Unlike the Melomania M100, which featured a stemless design, the new A100 opts for a stemmed shape reminiscent of AirPods, blending familiar ergonomics with Cambridge’s distinct sound-first design philosophy.

High-Fidelity Hardware in a Compact Form

The Melomania A100 packs in custom-tuned 10mm drivers paired with Class AB amplification—a rare find in wireless earbuds, and a nod to the brand’s analog audio roots. This unique combination aims to deliver the authentic “Cambridge Sound,” characterized by clarity, warmth, and dynamic balance.

To offer a personalized listening experience, the earbuds include a seven-band adjustable EQ with six genre-specific presets and fully customizable sound profiles. The onboard “DynamEQ” feature ensures balanced sound even at lower volumes, adapting in real time to maintain musical integrity.

Smart Features: Touch Controls, ANC, and Dual Connectivity

The A100 includes touch-sensitive controls that are fully user-configurable via the redesigned Melomania Connect app, now available on both iOS and Android.

Each earbud features six microphones, used for crystal-clear calls, active noise cancellation (ANC), and transparency mode—giving users full control of their audio environment.

The earbuds also feature Bluetooth 5.4 with multi-device pairing, allowing users to seamlessly switch between two connected devices.

Battery Life Built for Extended Listening

Cambridge Audio promises up to 39 hours of total battery life, with 11 hours per charge (ANC off) or 6.5 hours (ANC on). The charging case adds 28 more hours, and a 10-minute quick charge yields up to 3 hours of playback—perfect for those on the go.

Hi-Res Wireless Audio Support

The Melomania A100 stands out for its broad codec support, including LDAC, aptX Lossless, aptX Adaptive, AAC, and SBC. This allows users to stream high-resolution, uncompressed audio wirelessly from platforms like Tidal, Qobuz, or Apple Music Lossless.

Designed for Real Life

With an IPX5 water resistance rating, the A100 is resistant to sweat, dust, and light rain, making it a reliable companion for workouts, commutes, and unpredictable weather.

The updated Melomania Connect app offers firmware updates, EQ tuning, and device control with a cleaner, more intuitive interface—further enhancing the user experience.

Audiophile Performance in Your Pocket

The Melomania A100 represents a major leap forward in Cambridge Audio’s journey into portable listening. With studio-grade sound, adaptive audio technologies, and long-lasting comfort, it’s a strong contender in the high-end earbud space—especially for listeners who value audio purity as much as smart functionality.

Pricing and availability details are expected to follow soon via Cambridge Audio’s official channels and selected global retailers.

Nvidia's RTX 5070 and DLSS 4: Redefining Performance or Complicating the Debate?

Nvidia's RTX 5070


Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang set the tech world abuzz at CES 2025 with a bold claim: the $549 RTX 5070 offers RTX 4090 performance. This statement has since sparked debates among industry professionals and gamers, centering on Nvidia’s latest DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation technology. While the prospect of high-performance GPUs at a fraction of the cost is tantalizing, it also raises questions about how we define performance in an era of AI-driven rendering.

The RTX 5070: Promises and Limitations

Nvidia’s claim rests on the capabilities of its Deep Learning Super Sampling (DLSS) 4 technology. The system leverages Multi Frame Generation, which can produce up to three additional frames for every traditionally rendered frame, offering substantial improvements in frame rates. For instance, in Cyberpunk 2077, DLSS 4 boosts frame rates from 27fps to 243fps—a remarkable leap.

However, this enhancement is rooted in neural rendering, not traditional rasterization. As Nvidia’s Lars Weinand clarified, the RTX 5070’s performance doesn’t match the RTX 4090 across all configurations. Instead, it aligns with RTX 4090 performance levels in DLSS 4-optimized scenarios, particularly in games that support full ray-tracing.

Nvidia's RTX 5070


The "Fake Frames" Debate

Central to the controversy is the perception of "fake frames." DLSS technology generates additional frames algorithmically, which some critics argue undermines the authenticity of rendered performance. While these frames create visually smoother gameplay, they may introduce input latency, impacting the tactile experience.

Weinand emphasized Nvidia’s efforts to mitigate these drawbacks, citing latency improvements in DLSS 4 and the use of a new transformer model that is 40% faster and consumes 30% less VRAM. Nonetheless, the technique’s success depends heavily on gamers’ sensitivity to latency. Casual players may find the enhancements revolutionary, while enthusiasts could remain skeptical.

DLSS 4: A Paradigm Shift in Gaming Performance


DLSS 4 isn’t merely about higher frame rates; it reflects a broader trend toward AI-powered rendering techniques. Modern gaming has long relied on approximations, from dynamic resolution scaling to lighting effects that simulate reality. DLSS 4 represents the next stage of this evolution, offering developers tools to push visual boundaries.

The implications extend beyond Nvidia. Competitors like AMD are refining their FSR 4 upscaling technology, while Sony incorporates AI rendering into its gaming platforms. The success of DLSS 4 could accelerate the adoption of similar solutions across the industry, shaping the future of PC and console gaming alike.

Balancing Innovation with User Expectations

For businesses, Nvidia’s RTX 5070 signals a potential paradigm shift in how value is defined in GPU markets. By offering near-flagship performance at mid-range prices, Nvidia is positioning itself as both an innovator and a disruptor. Yet, the “fake frames” debate underscores a critical challenge: balancing technological advancement with user trust and expectations.

As AI-driven rendering becomes the norm, businesses must navigate the nuanced trade-offs between visual fidelity, performance authenticity, and user experience. For Nvidia, the RTX 5070 and DLSS 4 could redefine gaming performance benchmarks, but they also place the company under heightened scrutiny—a dual-edged sword for any market leader.

Conclusion

Nvidia’s RTX 5070, with its promise of high-end performance at a lower price point, represents a significant step forward in democratizing cutting-edge gaming technology. However, its reliance on DLSS 4’s AI-driven enhancements invites a broader discussion about what constitutes genuine performance in modern gaming.

As the industry embraces these advanced techniques, businesses, developers, and consumers must collectively decide where to draw the line between innovation and authenticity. One thing is clear: the future of gaming is here, and it’s powered by AI.

From Carbon Neutrality to Rainwater Recycling: Cities Leading Sustainable Tourism



With the rise of conscious tourism and growing concern for the environmental impact of travel, some cities around the world are taking significant steps to become more sustainable destinations. These efforts aim not only to preserve the natural environment and reduce the carbon footprint but also to improve the quality of life for both residents and visitors.

In this context, the Global Sustainability Index stands as a crucial benchmark for identifying cities that are leading the way to a greener future. Among the highlighted metropolises, five stand out for their innovative strategies and commitments to sustainability:



Gothenburg, Sweden


Gothenburg, known for its ambition to achieve carbon neutrality by 2030, is a living example of how sustainable policies can be integrated into people's daily lives. The city has remained at the top of the Global Sustainability Index for several years, reflecting its ongoing dedication to improving its green infrastructure and promoting environmentally friendly practices among its inhabitants and visitors.



Oslo, Norway


Oslo, for its part, is distinguished by its infrastructure dedicated to electric vehicles and cyclists, as well as its green spaces and efforts to promote more sustainable tourism and business practices. Despite Norway's economic dependency on oil and gas, the capital strives to lead by example in the transition to renewable energy sources and more sustainable practices.



Glasgow, Scotland

In Glasgow, the shift towards a more sustainable future is tangible. The city focuses not only on improving air quality and promoting bicycle use but is also investing in circular economies to minimize waste and maximize resource reuse. These initiatives reflect a deep commitment to environmental conservation and the well-being of its citizens.



Bordeaux, France

Bordeaux, world-famous for its wine, is also making a name for itself in the realm of sustainability. The French city aspires for the majority of its tourism stakeholders to be eco-certified by 2026, demonstrating a progressive approach to reducing the carbon footprint in the tourism sector and promoting sustainable practices across the community.



Goyang, South Korea

Finally, Goyang stands out as a model of sustainability outside Europe. The city has adopted innovative measures, such as rainwater recycling and the promotion of green spaces and bicycle-sharing systems, showing that a commitment to the environment can coexist harmoniously with urban development.

These cities not only represent ideal destinations for travelers conscious of their environmental impact but are also inspiring examples of how communities can evolve towards more sustainable practices.

USA

Why semiconductors are central to world economy, geopolitics



The Chinese Communist Party Congress opens in Beijing on October 16, a week after Washington imposed tight restrictions on exports of invaluable semiconductor technology to China in a bid to stop it from surpassing the US economically and militarily. As semiconductors emerge as a key battleground, FRANCE 24 spoke to the author of a new bestseller on these all-important pieces of silicon.

For years, semiconductors have been crucial to everything from fridges to ballistic missiles. But only recently have they captured public attention.

Washington demonstrated the US semiconductor industry’s almighty power in 2018 when Donald Trump’s Commerce Department banned Chinese telecoms firm ZTE from buying chips designed in the US. These measures nearly drove the company to collapse before the erratic then-president reversed the measure.

But semiconductors only came to dominate the headlines in early 2021. A constellation of factors – notably Covid lockdowns warping consumer demand – sparked a chip shortage crisis, which pushed up inflation and caused shortages of goods from cars to mobile phones.

Now the spotlight is on semiconductors once more ahead of the Chinese Communist Party Congress, after President Joe Biden’s Commerce Department unveiled on October 7 sweeping new measures curtailing US exports of semiconductor technology to China. This was part of Biden’s response to President Xi Jinping’s plans to wean China off US-designed chips and make it a world leader in the sector.

To look more closely at how semiconductors rose to the forefront of international economics and politics, FRANCE 24 spoke to Chris Miller, author of the recently published bestseller "Chip War" and associate professor of international history at Tufts University, visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and Eurasia Director at the Foreign Policy Research Institute.

What are semiconductor chips and how did they become so central to the world economy and daily life?

Semiconductors are small pieces of silicon with millions and billions of tiny circuits carved into them. These circuits provide the computing power inside almost any device with an on-off switch: smartphones, computers, datacentres, automobiles and dishwashers.

The typical person will interact with dozens if not hundreds of semiconductors each day, though we almost never see them.

How important was the US’s advantage in semiconductors to its victory in the Cold War?

The US advantage in computing was crucial. From the earliest days of the missile race, the Pentagon was fixated on applying computing power to defence systems. The first major application of chips was in missile guidance systems, but today they are used in everything from communications to sensors to electronic warfare.

Just as the typical person will interact with dozens of chips each day, militaries are crucially reliant on chips' processing power and signals processing capability. What’s more, as militaries begin to experiment with increasingly autonomous systems, they’ll be even more reliant on advanced chips.

How did Taiwan – specifically the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) – come to nearly dominate chip manufacturing? And what would happen to the world economy if TSMC’s facilities in Taiwan are damaged in war?

TSMC is the world’s most advanced maker of processor chips, thanks to its enormous scale and extraordinary manufacturing precision. Today, TSMC produces 90 percent of the most advanced processor chips, which go into everything from smartphones to PCs to datacentres.

If a war were to knock their production offline, the cost to the global economy would be measured in the hundreds of billions of dollars.

In Europe there’s this perception that we are behind when it comes to high-tech industries, but Dutch company ASML is the big exception to this. How did it come to play an invaluable role in chip manufacturing?

ASML produces the machines without which advanced chips can’t be made.

ASML’s specialisation is in lithography, and it has 100 percent market share in the production of the most advanced lithography machines. It has honed these capabilities over many years and today is a critical supplier to companies like Samsung, TSMC and Intel.

Do you think China has what it takes to match or supersede the US when it comes to semiconductors?

For several years now, Washington has been worried about the national security implications of China catching up in the semiconductor business, especially in light of Xi Jinping’s Made in China 2025 initiative making chips a top priority.

China has been investing many tens of billions of dollars into government chip-development programs. These programmes have delivered substantial progress in some spheres, notably chip design.

However, across the board, China remains far behind capabilities in the US, South Korea or Taiwan in terms of fabricating chips. In addition, all chip fabrication in China today relies on machine tools imported from abroad, largely from the US, the Netherlands and Japan.

Do you think President Joe Biden’s plans to bring more chip production back to the US are a good idea, given the security implications of the overwhelming majority of manufacturing of advanced processor chips being based in Taiwan?

Today 90 percent of the world’s most advanced processor chips are produced in Taiwan. Given China's growing military might and Xi Jinping’s aggressive nationalism, this is a risk to the global economy that has grown too large.

Efforts to diversify the geography of advanced chipmaking are a smart move from this perspective. This explains why the US, Japan and Europe are all trying to bolster their countries’ position in the semiconductor supply chain.

Architects Propose a Giant Futuristic Ring Like Circle Around Dubai’s Burj Khalifa



Dubai-based architecture firm ZNera Space has proposed a new type of contemporary symbol for the city: a green and natural landmark that serves as a "continuous metropolis" around Burj Khalifa. Dubbed "Downtown Circle", the project features installing a giant ring-like structure of 550 meters in length around the world’s tallest free-standing structure. The structure will "investigate how at this critical time in the country’s development, architects, and urban planners can move away from previous urban models of isolated skyscrapers, towards a more humane typology that seeks to emulate nature and create diverse public spaces".

The project comes as a response to the continuous rise of the global population, and how the fabric of urban centers is changing, especially in Dubai, where rapid urbanization drive has prompted rapid urban growth characterized by skyscrapers and sprawl. The 550 meter tall mega structure offers an alternative to the singular and unconnected high-rises found in most metropolitan areas.



The structure's circumference is 3 km. As it encircles the Burj Khalifa, it draws panoramic views and clean air from the skypark which forms the central spine of the development. The large scale of the structure is broken down into smaller units to create a variety of spaces to serve public, commercial, and cultural programs. The project offers a variety of office and housing typologies, from large offices and living/working units, to lofts, townhouses, and terraced houses.

The downtown circle project aims to establish a sustainable and a self sufficient vertical urbanism, creating a hyper-efficient urban center that gives back to the environment. The footprint of the building is composed of two main rings, which are held together by a a continuous green belt – the “skypark” – which is illuminated with natural light and has offices and research centers embedded in it. The “skypark” connects the floors with each other vertically, creating a connected three-dimensional urban green eco system.

The concept is a potential answer to the global search for new, mixed urban typologies, which combine high densities and lavish greenery, dynamic urban functions and a high-quality user experience, following the demand for both climate protection and environmental excellence. Different climates are recreated inside the continuous skypark, where visitors can experience canyons, sandy dunes, and plants from various floras. Swamps, waterfalls, tropical vegetation, digital caves, cascades, fruit-trees, and flowers of various hues and species enrich the green eco system.



In order to give back to the natural environment, the plan includes proposed areas for rainwater harvesting and solar power. The design also stores carbon and filters pollutants from the air, in addition to providing sanctuaries for wild plants and food production. The Skypark within the structure will provide residents with a connection to nature and enable opportunities for outdoor recreation and a healthier lifestyle. Taking into account the coastal development and how vulnerable they are to rising sea levels, the proposed typology explores remedies and proposes a unique urban model in response to this threat.

As for transportation, a fleet of suspended peripheral pods transport passengers from one node to another within the Downtown circle. These suspended vessels travel through a network of rail at the bottom tier towards their destination. 20-passenger pods are loaded at the outer perimeter ring and are connected through a pressurized vessels attached to the main lift cores. These hyper pods can travel at speeds of 100 kilometers per hour, and capture a 360 view of the entire city at the height of 500 meters.

U.S. House set to give Biden huge win with $430 billion bill on climate, drug prices

¿

The U.S. House of Representatives will vote Friday on a $430 billion bill to fight climate change and lower prescription drug prices, in what Democrats view as a major political win for President Joe Biden ahead of November's midterm elections.

Democrats say the legislation will help reduce the federal deficit, cut domestic greenhouse gas emissions, allow Medicare to negotiate lower drug prices for the elderly and ensure corporations and the wealthy pay the taxes they owe.

Titled the "Inflation Reduction Act," the measure passed the Senate along party lines on Sunday after a marathon, 27-hour session. House approval would send the bill on to the White House for Biden to sign into law. A vote on passage was expected on Friday afternoon.

"House Democrats will pass and send to the president the landmark Inflation Reduction Act," House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, the chamber's top Democrat, predicted this week in a letter to her party colleagues.

"This bill makes a tremendous difference at the kitchen table of America's families," Pelosi said.

Republicans oppose the legislation, warning that it will kill jobs by raising corporate tax bills, further fuel inflation with government spending and inhibit the development of new drugs.

Business groups have had a mixed reaction to the bill, which offers the prospect of higher tax bills for some companies while at the same time giving protections to the fossil fuel industry.

The bill's main revenue source is a novel 15% corporate minimum tax aimed at stopping large, profitable companies from gaming the Internal Revenue Service code to slash their tax bills to zero.

Investors looking to pour cash into clean energy products can expect at least a decade of federal subsidies through long-term tax credits for wind and solar and new credits for energy storage, biogas and hydrogen. Developers who use U.S.-made equipment or build in poorer areas will find additional support.

But the bill does not leave the U.S. fossil fuels industry out in the cold. Some provisions allow the federal government to authorize new wind and solar energy developments on federal land only when it is also auctioning rights to drill for oil and natural gas.

A $7,500 tax credit to encourage U.S. consumers to buy electric vehicles could not be used for most EV models on the market, according to major automakers, who warn that the legislation will put achieving U.S. EV adoption targets for 2030 in jeopardy.

To be eligible for the credit, vehicles must be assembled in North America, which would make some current EVs ineligible as soon as the bill takes effect.

The bill has been more than 18 months in the making. It represents a final version of Biden's original sweeping Build Back Better plan, which had to be whittled down in the face of opposition from Republicans and key legislators from his own party.

Democrats, who have been weighed down for months by inflation and Biden's anemic job approval numbers, hope the legislation will help them at the polls in November, when voters decide the balance of power in Congress ahead of the 2024 presidential election.

Biden himself plans to travel across the country to tout the bill along with a series of other legislative victories as a win for voters and a defeat for special interests.

Republicans are favored to win a majority in the House in November and could also take control of the Senate.

But in a hopeful sign for Democrats, Biden's public approval has risen this week to its highest level since early June, as a result of recent legislative successes, according to a Reuters/Ipsos opinion poll.

The two-day national poll found that 40% of Americans approve of Biden's job performance, a level of support that is historically low for a U.S. president but up from his rock-bottom level of 36% in May.

In addition to the Inflation Reduction Act, Biden has gained momentum from legislative wins aimed at boosting U.S. competitiveness against China and expanding healthcare benefits for millions of veterans exposed to toxic burn pits.

About half of Americans -- some 49% -- support the climate and drug pricing legislation, including 69% of Democrats and 34% of Republicans, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted Aug. 3 and 4. The most popular element of the bill is giving Medicare the power to negotiate drug prices, which 71% of respondents support, including 68% of Republicans.

European shares rise as healthcare, leisure stocks gain


European shares rose on Friday after drugmakers rebounded following a slump in the previous session, and Flutter fanned a rally in the travel and leisure sector after an upbeat earnings forecast.

Shares in GSK (GSK.L), Sanofi (SASY.PA) and Haleon (HLN.L) rose between 0.8% and 3.6% after the drugmakers said that nothing material had changed regarding U.S. litigation focused on heartburn drug Zantac.

The stocks had fallen sharply this week on concerns over potential cancer-causing impurities that prompted the drug's withdrawal from markets.

The European healthcare sector (.SXDP) gained 0.2%, with the STOXX 600 index (.STOXX) also rising 0.2%.

"We raise (European) pharma from marketweight to overweight, as our macro projections imply scope for 10%+ outperformance by the first quarter next year after the sharp recent pull-back," said Sebastian Raedler and Thomas Pearce, investment strategists at Bank of America.

But any rallies in the STOXX 600 are not likely to last, they added. "The main prerequisite for a sustained rally is a trough in the macro cycle and renewed acceleration in growth momentum, but growth headwinds remain considerable."

Euro area PMI is likely to be weaker due to tightening credit, and low Russian gas deliveries raise the risk of winter rationing, which could tip the region into recession, the strategists added.

A European bank agreed to process a payment for the transit of Russian oil through Ukraine, sources said, removing the cause of a stoppage of oil supplies to central Europe last week.

Meanwhile, travel & leisure stocks (.SXTP) jumped 3.9% to more than two month highs, leading sectoral gains.

Flutter surged 14.4% to the top of the travel index, as it saw no sign of cash-strapped customers betting less and gave another positive update on its rapidly growing U.S. business.

Irish stocks (.ISEQ) added 2.7%, boosted by Flutter.

The STOXX 600 index, up for a third straight day, notched weekly gains of 1.2% as positive earnings and a softer-than-expected U.S. inflation reading calmed nerves around aggressive rate hikes by the Federal Reserve, though concerns remain over policymakers' path.

European shares have fallen 9.6% so far this year compared with a nearly 11% decline for Wall Street's S&P 500 index (.SPX), which was largely dragged down by drops in big growth stocks in the first half of the year.

London stocks (.FTSE) gained 0.5% after data showed Britain's economy contracted by less than feared in the second quarter.

Roche (ROG.S) rose 1.6% after the drugmaker received approval from the U.S. Food and Drugs Administration for its Xofluza drug to treat influenza in children aged five years and older.

Disney raises streaming prices after services post a big operating loss

Starting Dec. 8 in the U.S., Disney+ with commercials will be $7.99 per month — currently the price of Disney+ without ads.

Disney unveiled a new pricing structure that incorporates an advertising-supported Disney+ as part of an effort to make its streaming business profitable.

Starting Dec. 8 in the U.S., Disney+ with commercials will be $7.99 per month — currently the price of Disney+ without ads. The price of ad-free Disney+ will rise 38% to $10.99 — a $3 per month increase.

The price of Hulu without ads will rise by $2 per month, from $12.99 to $14.99, effective Oct. 10. Hulu with ads will go up by $1 per month, rising from $6.99 to $7.99.

Disney announced last month that ESPN+ with ads would go up 43% to $9.99 per month.

The price increases reflect the growing operating loss for Disney’s streaming services. Disney+, Hulu and ESPN+ combined to lose $1.1 billion in the fiscal third quarter, $300 million more than the average analyst estimate, reflecting the higher cost of content on the services. The increased operating loss occurred even while Disney added about 15 million new Disney+ subscribers in the quarter, about 5 million more than analysts estimated.

Disney has previously stated it plans to lose money on Disney+ until 2024. Chief Financial Officer Christine McCarthy reiterated on Wednesday’s earnings conference call that Disney+’s losses will peak during the company’s fiscal 2022.

Average revenue per user for Disney+ decreased by 5% in the quarter in the U.S. and Canada due to more customers taking cheaper multiproduct offerings.

Overall, the company’s quarterly results, also announced Wednesday, beat analysts’ expectations on the top and bottom lines. Disney+ subscriptions rose to 152.1 million during the most recent period, higher than Wall Street’s projections of 147 million.

Bundled pricing


Disney also announced new bundle prices incorporating its Disney+ product with commercials.

For existing customers only, a bundle of Disney+ without ads and Hulu and ESPN+ with ads will increase by $1, from $13.99 to $14.99.

The price of a bundle of Disney+, Hulu and ESPN+, all with ads, will be $12.99, or $1 lower than the current Disney bundle price.

Consumers will be able to purchase a Disney+ and Hulu bundle for $9.99 per month with commercials. That’s a discount to paying for Disney+ and Hulu with ads separately.

The price of a no-ad Disney+ and no-ad Hulu, with ESPN+, remains $19.99 per month.

Disney will also have new pricing for its Hulu with live TV bundles. Subscribers that want Hulu with live TV and Disney+, Hulu and ESPN+ with commercials will pay $69.99 per month.

For existing customers, Disney will offer Disney+ without commercials in that bundle for $74.99. The premium bundle of Hulu with live TV along with Disney+ and Hulu without ads will be $82.99 per month.

Webb telescope wows with first images


The Carina nebula is a cloud of gas and dust where new stars are born. Denser parts collapse under gravity, forming protostars that draw more material into a disk from which planets form.NASA; ESA; CSA; STSCI


Pictures showcase start of science campaign for NASA’s largest space telescope

At long last, eager astronomers—and the public—get to view snapshots of the universe provided by the James Webb Space Telescope, the largest, most complex, and most expensive space telescope ever built. Yesterday, in a sneak preview, the White House released one picture, a deep image bristling with thousands of distant galaxies. Today, NASA released four more that demonstrate Webb’s ability to scrutinize gas clouds and planetary systems closer to home.

The images—a product of Webb’s giant, majestic, gold-plated mirror—are not only sharper than those of the Hubble Space Telescope, but are also essentially different, capturing the longer, infrared wavelengths that are important for many branches of astronomy. For Webb’s engineers and designers, who have endured years of delay and a nerve-wracking 6 months of launch, deployment, and commissioning, the relief is palpable. “I’m feeling a mix of excitement and emotion. [Webb] has really delivered, and there will be a rush of new discoveries,” says Brant Robertson of the University of California (UC), Santa Cruz, who helped develop Webb’s near-infrared camera.

For most astronomers, the wait isn’t quite over yet, as their scheduled observations may not happen for weeks or months. Exoplanet researcher Laura Kreidberg of the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy (MPIA) is one of the lucky ones. As part of a large collaboration doing “early release science” with Webb, she’ll get to see their first tranche of data in 2 days. Nevertheless, “It’s a long wait from Tuesday to Thursday,” she says. But come Thursday afternoon when the data start to pour in, “I’ll make a big pot of coffee, put out some snacks, and we’ll sit and look at it.”

Originally conceived in the 1990s and built with European and Canadian contributions, Webb at times seemed like a cursed mission, buffeted by cost overruns, schedule slips, and technical hitches. Beset by criticism, “It was hard to keep the team at the edge of excellence,” NASA science chief Thomas Zurbuchen said at a recent briefing. But after a flawless launch on 25 December 2021, those trials are almost forgotten. “I don’t think any of us expected how well it went,” Zurbuchen says.

The accuracy of the launch, on a European Ariane 5 rocket, meant Webb didn’t have to use much fuel for course corrections and now has more to keep itself in a gravitational pocket on the opposite side of Earth from the Sun, about 1.5 million kilometers away. Planned as a 10-year mission, Webb is now expected to last at least twice as long.

The launch of the $10 billion instrument did not end the tension. To unfurl its giant sunshield, swing six of the 18 segments in the 6.5-meter-wide mirror into position, and extend the secondary mirror on its booms, engineers had to navigate some 300 steps, any one of which could have doomed the mission. “Every day the risk level has gone down and my ability to sleep has increased,” says Charlie Atkinson, the project’s chief engineer at Northrop Grumman, NASA’s prime contractor for the mission.

Tiny motors adjusted the position, tilt, and curvature of the mirror segments by fractions of a hair’s breadth until they could together focus on targets as a single mirror. Operators then had to check out Webb’s four instruments, a mix of cameras and spectrographs, which split incoming light into its component wavelengths. “We have an observatory in excellent shape, that meets or exceeds expectations,” Bill Ochs, Webb’s project manager at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, announced today.

Not everything went according to plan. Some computer glitches required a few hours’ pause. The mirror has been dinged by a handful of micrometeorites—that was expected but one was larger than models predicted and operators are working to mitigate its impact. “There have been some issues,” Ochs says. “But when you have a good team, you can get through it.”

By 21 June, Webb was taking data for the 286 teams of scientists who had been allotted time on the telescope in its first year, known as cycle one. “We’ve got some amazing science in the can,” Zurbuchen says. Researchers have reported seeing that some of their scheduled observations have taken place, but NASA sat on the data until this week, when commissioning officially ends. Now, Atkinson says, “We hand over the keys. It’s ready. Go do science.”

The pictures and spectra released today are the result of a yearlong selection process that Zurbuchen calls “bottom-up.” NASA wanted to show off the telescope’s capabilities and offer a taste of the different fields of astronomy it will transform. So managers asked the instrument and science teams for a range of targets that would show “the best of this thing,” Zurbuchen says. Some 70 were suggested and these were whittled down by a committee to the five released so far.


Stephan’s Quintet is a compact group of four galaxies with another in the foreground. Filaments of glowing gas are signs of shock waves as the galaxies interact. One day the four will likely merge.NASA; ESA; CSA; STSCI



The Southern Ring nebula is a glowing shell of ionized gas blown off by a giant star at the end of its life. A white dwarf at its center—the stellar cinder of the giant—emits ultraviolet light that causes the nebula to fluoresce.NASA; ESA; CSA; STSCI



SMACS 0723 is a deep field containing thousands of galaxies. The gravity of galaxies in the foreground acts as a lens to magnify and distort more distant galaxies.NASA; ESA; CSA; STSCI


One picture, of the galaxy cluster SMAC 0723, showcases Webb’s ability to peer into the most distant corners of the universe and hence the furthest back in time. It shows a field crowded with thousands of galaxies, some with shapes distorted by the intense gravitational field of a galaxy cluster in the foreground. A spectrum from a 13.1-billion-year-old galaxy in the image showed it contained oxygen, hydrogen, and neon—the most distant galaxy for which we know the constituents. Dominika Wylezalek of Heidelberg University calls the image “mind-blowing.” “The level of detail is really breathtaking.”

Hubble saw much further back than its designers ever imagined, spying a galaxy that existed just 400 million years after the big bang—3% of the universe’s current age. But Webb will see many more galaxies that are even younger, not just because of its larger mirror, but also because of its sensitivity to infrared light. Photons emitted by the earliest stars are stretched in their journey by the expansion of the universe, pushing them into infrared wavelengths that Hubble cannot see. Previously, says Sarah Bosman of MPIA, “We could only see the very bright galaxies, and the biggest. With Webb, we’ll see the whole array.”

Galaxy surveys will help astronomers understand the early history of these agglomerations: when they started to form stars and how quickly they organized into the disklike spirals such as the Milky Way. “Webb is capable of filling in the gaps,” Robertson says. Webb will also help figure out what ionized the neutral hydrogen gas that filled the universe before the stars turned on. By the time of the universe’s billionth birthday, that hydrogen was ionized. Astronomers think this was mostly the work of high-energy ultraviolet photons from the first generation of stars, which were huge and bright and made solely of this primordial hydrogen. But Hubble hasn’t seen enough early galaxies to account for the needed photons. “Webb is the only facility that can see” this early era, Robertson says.

Another one of the released pictures is of the well-known Stephan’s Quintet, a cluster of four interacting galaxies 290 million light-years away that sits behind a fifth galaxy in the foreground. Seen with Webb, it is possible to discern glowing gas and dust heated by two of the merging galaxies and areas of active star formation generated by that turmoil. “It is this sort of interaction that drives the evolution of galaxies,” says Giovanna Giardino of the European Space Agency.

Alice Shapley of UC Los Angeles will use Webb’s near-infrared spectrograph (NIRSpec) to tease apart the light from galaxies to find out how hot they are, how they’re moving, and what they’re made of. She’s interested in faint emission lines from interstellar oxygen gas, which show up as spikes in spectra. The oxygen is created in massive stars and scattered when they die. “It tells you how many stars are made,” she says, and is a good marker for the flows of gas in and out of a galaxy.

The information will help researchers understand why some galaxies are prolific creators of stars, whereas others are subdued or even dead. Earth’s atmosphere clouds the view of these oxygen lines for most ground-based spectrographs. NIRSpec uses a mask covered with tiny shutters to gather light and generate spectra from dozens of galaxies simultaneously, which should increase the number of galaxies with known oxygen lines by an order of magnitude. “Webb allows us to go so much further,” Shapley says. “It’s going to be amazing.”

Misty Bentz of Georgia State University will test a different NIRSpec capability: taking a spectroscopic “image” in which every pixel has its own separate spectrum. Her project involves staring for 9 hours at a single galaxy, the nearby NGC 4151—dubbed the Eye of Sauron because of the eerie glow of the supermassive black hole at its heart, which shines brightly as it heats up gas being drawn into its maw. Bentz will look for subtle changes to the spectrum of the swirling gas that reveal the black hole’s mass, showcasing NIRSpec’s ability to take faint spectra of the gas while blocking the bright area around the black hole itself.

Webb will also study targets within the Milky Way—objects like the Carina nebula, one of today’s released pictures. Webb’s image of the vast stellar nursery, 7600 light-years from Earth, contains hundreds of newly born stars that have never been seen before, as well as swirling dust and gas buffeted by stellar wind. Hubble also imaged this local landmark, but Webb’s image has “so much more detail,” says NASA deputy project scientist Amber Straughn.

Within such stellar nurseries, dense clumps of gas gradually collapse to form stars. Melissa McClure of the Leiden Observatory will use Webb to peer into such clouds to see whether they are factories for complex molecules that could give life a head start even before star and planet formation begins. Hundreds of different molecules have been detected as gases, but gases don’t react efficiently unless frozen onto solid interstellar grains of dust. The grains are like singles bars, McClure jokes, where atoms and simple molecules go to join up. So far, only methanol ice has been detected in space, but McClure expects Webb will routinely find ices for molecules such as methane and ammonia. The real prize would be finding complex carbon-based molecules with more than six atoms, such as ethanol or acetaldehyde. “A conclusive detection would be really awesome,” McClure says.

Among NASA’s offerings this week, the most tantalizing taste of what’s to come is the spectrum of an exoplanet. It’s from a giant planet known as WASP-96b orbiting close to a star 1150 light-years from Earth. During regular passes in front of its home star, some starlight is absorbed by gases in WASP-96b’s atmosphere, leaving telltale dips in the star’s spectrum. Theoretical models suggest carbon monoxide and dioxide, as well as methane, may be present, but Hubble and ground-based telescopes couldn’t see them. The first spectrum of WASP-96b shows clear signatures of water vapor in the planet’s atmosphere, and features that indicate the presence of clouds and vapor haze. Astronomers will have to wait for future transits to see what else is there. “I’m really excited to see if the predictions bear out,” Kreidberg says.

Using the Hubble and Spitzer space telescopes, researchers have only been able to spy water and sodium in exoplanet atmospheres. “It’s been like reading a poem and only seeing every third word,” Kreidberg says. Webb is expected to find a wealth of molecules, some of which can hint at a planet’s potential habitability: carbon monoxide and dioxide, methane, ammonia, phosphine, and more. They will be able to probe the atmospheres of every kind of planet from hot Jupiters, through mini-Neptunes, to rocky planets like Earth. “Webb can do everything,” Kreidberg says. Hundreds of exoplanet researchers are preparing feverishly for the expected data deluge from other transiting exoplanets, organizing hackathons and data challenges, and devising data processing pipelines. “We’ve done a huge amount of work to make sure we’re ready,” Kreidberg says. “There’s no calm before the storm.”

A small fraction of Webb’s time will go to objects in the Solar System, but for targets so close and so large—from Webb’s point of view—saturating the instruments is a real problem, says Imke de Pater of UC Berkeley. She will study Jupiter’s thin ring, which may still be rippling in the wake of the 1994 impact of Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9. Imaging the faint ring next to the much brighter planet will be a challenge, but she hopes to discover more ripples, which could signal more recent, unseen comet impacts. De Pater’s fondest wish would be detecting new moonlets of just a few hundred meters diameter or less. “That would be a dream,” she says.

For many more, the dream has already come true—an effort that took 30 years and some 20,000 people around the world to bear fruit. “Beyond the science, [Webb] is rekindling a sense of beauty and wonder about the universe that inspired me to become an astronomer,” Robertson says. “I couldn’t be happier.”

Boris Johnson threatens to privatise Passport Office




Boris Johnson has threatened to privatise the Passport Office if it does not start delivering better value for money, a source has said.

During a cabinet meeting, the PM is understood to have told ministers the high cost of services was affecting families ahead of the summer holidays.

Mr Johnson is expected to call its bosses for urgent talks next week.

If they cannot promise better value, No 10 will see if the "private sector can do it in their place".

A source also said the PM made the same threat about the DVLA "if it does not get its act together", with Mr Johnson said to be concerned about how delays in issuing licences had impacted hauliers and supply chains.

The Passport Office - which reports directly to the Home Office - is dealing with a large backlog as the number of new applications rocketed after the pandemic and Brexit.

A government source said many families were being forced for pay for premium services because of delays in the system, and travellers have reported needing to cancel holidays.

They claimed the issue "goes to the heart of the cost of living" and "basic competence" of arms-length government bodies.

But the Public and Commercial Services Union (PCS) said the threat of privatisation was "absurd" when "it is clear that the current problems are mainly down to increased casualisation of the workforce".

The union said a lack of staff and poor management were among the causes of the backlog in processing passport applications.

Home Office Minister Kevin Foster told MPs on Monday the service had processed one million applications last month, compared to seven million for the whole of last year.

He said the government had no intention of letting the current processing time slide further, but urged people to apply to renew outdated passports "as soon as possible".

'Disappointing delays'

The rise in passport applications is thought to be down to people putting off renewing while they could not travel during the pandemic, with the Passport Office estimating five million applications were delayed in 2020 and 2021.

It has also been linked to a change in the rules for travelling to some EU countries post-Brexit, because passports must be no more than 10 years old from the point of issue.

Earlier this month, the director general of the Passport Office, Abi Tierney, advised people to allow up to 10 weeks when applying for their passport, adding: "Our dedicated staff are working tirelessly to ensure that passport applications are processed as quickly as possible."

But the SNP's Stuart McDonald called it a "predictable mess", telling the Commons: "All our constituents are having to cancel holidays, miss funerals, rearrange visits, with even a new 10-week target routinely being failed."

Labour MP Stephanie Peacock also told MPs about a mother in her constituency who had submitted her daughter's passport application in January - five months in advance of their holiday next week - but has yet to receive one.

She asked: "What is the minister doing to address the unacceptable delays in passport applications?"

Home Secretary Priti Patel said she would examine the case, adding: "That's a very, very unusual delay, there must be a problem."

The boss of Heathrow Airport, John Holland-Kaye, called the delays "disappointing".

He told the Press Association: "Normally the Passport Office is very slick in processing passports. If it's not resolved, it is going to mean that people can't get away.

"After two years of lockdown, we need to make sure people can have a good holiday because many of them have vouchers that they've been saving up, they've got trips of a lifetime that they've put on hold, and we don't know when things might get closed down again.

"Making the most of the summer is vital."

Angela Rayner row: Does Parliament have a problem with misogyny?




It claimed Labour's deputy leader tries to distract Boris Johnson in Parliament by crossing and uncrossing her legs as she sits on the frontbench, facing the assembled Tory MPs.

But is misogyny - prejudice against women - the exception rather than the rule when it comes to the culture in Parliament?

It would be hard to argue that in the past Westminster was an easy place to be a woman.

A report in 2004 - entitled Whose secretary are you? - heard from female MPs, including Labour's Barbara Follett who recalled Conservatives pretending to juggle imaginary breasts when a woman spoke in the House of Commons.

Ex-education secretary Gillian Shephard said one of her colleagues called all women Betty because "you're all the same".

And Harriet Harman - who went to become Labour's deputy leader - said that, following a promotion, she was asked: "Who have you been sleeping with?"

That report was written nearly two decades ago - do MPs think much has changed since then?

Labour's shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves says the problem is "still massive" adding that: "There is not a single female MP or staff member in the Commons who doesn't have their own stories about sexism and misogyny."

Telling the BBC about her own experience, she said that in 2015, when she was pregnant with her second child, someone suggested she wouldn't be able to be in government because "I wouldn't be able to concentrate on having a baby and having a big job".

"No one says that about male MPs - that they can't be senior politicians and have children."

Caroline Nokes - the Conservative chair of the Women and Equalities Committee - told BBC 5 Live that she didn't experience open sexism, adding: "It would take a very brave man."

However, she added she had heard of comments made "behind my back".

"I can think of a minister in the current government who openly discusses my sex life as if it is something to be ashamed of when his own is far more colourful and varied.

"He calls me appalling names in the tea room... Westminster is a very gossipy place, it gets back to me."

She said she couldn't use the term on radio but said it is "unpleasant, demeaning, offensive".

'Appearances not policies'

Ms Nokes also argued female MPs are treated "unfairly" not just by their colleagues, but also in the media.

"They focus on their appearances, what they're wearing, their hair, as opposed to the content of what they say - you seldom see any sort of coverage about male MPs' appearance."

Her comments were echoed by her Tory colleague Alicia Kearns - MP for Rutland and Melton - who said "some journalists are incapable of writing about female MPs without denigrating their appearances rather than their policies".

But journalist Isabel Oakeshott said Westminster was not full of "marauding sexists" and that things had "got an awful lot better".

She suggested the problem was "as much with newspapers as the culture of Westminster" adding that papers may be lagging behind on the issue.

"This is the way papers work," she told the BBC's World at One programme. "They will look for a story which has a central female character who is, what papers will privately call, a 'presentable woman'.

"I don't think we should automatically assume that, because of the prominence the [Angela Rayner] story was given in the Mail on Sunday, that there is a huge problem at Westminster.

"That is not to say there isn't some problem at Westminster, there is in almost every workplace."


An uncomfortable workplace




With depressing regularity we're reminded that Westminster can be a very uncomfortable workplace for women.

In this case an offensive comment about how a senior female politician dresses rather than what she says, with a dose of snobbery thrown in.

But maybe we should take heart from the reaction to this unpleasant story. MPs from all parties, the prime minister and the Commons Speaker all publicly condemning the misogyny.

The increase in female MPs and political journalists has dramatically changed and improved the atmosphere in the Commons over the past 30 years, but there's still much room for improvement.

Regulating what male MPs say in private to journalists or to each other won't be easy. But a loud chorus of disapproval when these comments come to light should help ram home the message that times have changed.


Those looking for signs of progress could point to recent changes in the way complaints of harassment are handled.

The #MeToo campaign, in which women shared their own stories of sexual harassment, prompted questions about the culture in Westminster - particularly the way young members of staff were treated by MPs.

Former staff members not only complained about MPs' behaviour, but also how their grievances were dealt with.

A report by a high court judge found that aggressive, lewd and intimidation behaviour by MPs had been "tolerated and concealed" for years.

A new independent complaints procedure was set up which removed MPs from the process of judging whether one of their colleagues had breached conduct rules.

'Shut up and stay home'

Conservative Andrea Leadsom, who helped set up the new system, has acknowledged it needs improving - telling the BBC last year that investigations into complaints were taking too long.

"And that's not anyone's malicious intent, but justice delayed is justice denied. If it's going to take a year plus to resolve, that's going to undermine the credibility of the scheme," she said.

Ms Harman - the longest serving female MP in the House of Commons - says she hopes the new procedures will stop what has been "rife".

However, asked if things had got better since she started out in the 1980s, she said no.

"The things that I was subjected to when I was a young woman MP... it's exactly the same happening to Angela Rayner.

"Sexist briefing is an age-old way to shut people up... it's rooted in the idea that women should just shut up and stay home and don't have a right to be in Parliament.

"Well it won't work. Because women will not be shut up."

An Inside Look at the Life of Las Vegas Real Estate Mogul Richard Crighton



Very few people manage to conquer the real estate business, especially in a market as selective and competitive as Las Vegas; Even fewer accomplish this at a young age, but for Mr. Richard Crighton, nothing seems to be impossible.

The Las Vegas socialite and iconic entrepreneur became the youngest person in Nevada to open a real estate brokerage – The Rothwell Gornt Companies – when he was only twenty years old. Since then, Crighton and his team have amassed a series of accolades that include over half a billion dollars in real estate transactions, completed single transactions exceeding twenty million and the successful acquisition of multiple assets across the iconic metropolis, becoming a local legend in the process. People in Vegas love this man because he handles himself in a way that sparks joy and lifts the spirits of everyone around him, no matter what the external situation might be.

During the COVID-19 crisis, Crighton and a group of close friends took matters in their own hands and implemented a series of initiatives aimed at helping local businesses weather the storm and the city was certainly grateful. Since then, he has launched a popular podcast and the YouTube channel “Super Vegas Life” in which he shares some of his adventures with the audience and provides a glimpse inside the life of a young overachiever.

The secret to Crighton´s success can be described as insatiable hunger coupled with unwavering tenacity and determination in the face of adversity and what seems to be the “Midas touch” when it comes to all things real estate. His expertise includes development, commercial management and leasing as well as acquisition and disposition of distressed assets.

Mr. Crighton sold one of his businesses to boxing legend Floyd Mayweather, and proceeded to launch and co-found several other businesses; But Richard is as passionate about living on his own terms as he has always been about his multiple business endeavors.

A lover of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, Richard Crighton certainly exists on a higher level, but money is only one part of the equation.

Oftentimes, people who achieve great success in the business world are powerless as the joy of waking up every day is robbed by an erroneous mindset. Not Richard. He wakes up to his dream life every single morning and is adamant about sharing his success with those who surround him, he believes that this is one of the keys to real and profound success.

Recently, Mr. Crighton has shared with his Instagram® followers a series of videos which he titled “Travel with Me”; In these videos, he documents his adventures around the world, from Croatia to Mexico. Israel to Scotland and everywhere in between.

Through sharing a behind-the-scenes look at his unique lifestyle, Mr. Crighton has effectively become a source of inspiration for an entire generation of up and coming entrepreneurs who wish to learn from a man who built his own destiny, refusing to settle for anything but the very best that life has to offer.

Here’s What Goldman Sachs Is Expecting For Markets And The Economy In 2022



Goldman Sachs’ consumer and wealth management arm believes 2022 will be a huge year for value stocks while the broader S&P 500 Index will see single-digit growth of 6.3%.

The New York-based behemoth is bullish on energy stocks and healthcare stocks. It’s also overweight commodities and financial institutions, specifically in the Eurozone. The firm remains bullish on U.S. equities and bearish on the unappealing returns of cash and bonds.

Goldman’s projected 6.3% S&P 500 return is more muted than last year's robust 26.9% and 2020’s 16.1% level, but a number of uncertainties could work against stocks this year.

Head of Tactical Asset Allocation Brett Nelson told Forbes that his firm sees an 85% chance of the S&P 500 moving higher in 2022 with the Covid-19 pandemic at the center of much of the uncertainty.

The Fed’s monetary policy is also being watched closely. Goldman Sachs anticipates at least three interest rate hikes of 25 basis points but it’s optimistic that higher valuations that have been partially justified by low rates have room to run before facing major headwinds. Looking at historical data, Nelson told reporters that if rates got up to 5%, it would pose a challenging environment with interest outpacing inflation and growth.

Goldman expects the year to end with 3.1% unemployment, lower than the current rate of 3.9%. They also foresee a sizable reduction in inflation with expectations for a 3.4% consumer price index for December 2022, a marked deflation from the 7% rate from this past December.

Nelson has seen much of his firm’s expectations of value outperforming growth play out in the first couple weeks of 2022 as technology stocks and other growth stocks struggle, and energy and other value firms outperform while the 10-year treasury has moved up rapidly over the last month.

Microsoft nearly overtakes Apple as most valuable company

A surge in Microsoft Corp's (MSFT.O) shares nearly unseated Apple Inc (AAPL.O) as the world's most valuable company on Wednesday, a day before the iPhone maker reports its quarterly results.

Fueled by strong quarterly growth in its Azure cloud-computing business, Microsoft's shares jumped 4.2% to end at a record $323.17, elevating the software maker's market capitalization to $2.426 trillion, just short of Apple's $2.461 trillion valuation, according to Refinitiv data.

Apple's shares dipped 0.3% ahead of its report due after the bell on Thursday, with investors focused on how the global supply-chain crisis is challenging the company's ability to meet demand for its iPhones.

Microsoft's stock has rallied 45% this year, with pandemic-induced demand for its cloud-based services driving sales. Shares of Apple have climbed 12% in 2021.

Apple's stock market value overtook Microsoft's in 2010 as the iPhone made it the world's premier consumer technology company. The two companies have taken turns as Wall Street's most valuable company in recent years, with Apple holding the title since mid-2020.

In its report late on Tuesday, Microsoft forecast a strong end to the calendar year thanks to its booming cloud business, but it warned that supply-chain woes will continue to dog key units, such as those producing its Surface laptops and Xbox gaming consoles

Analysts on average expect Apple to report September-quarter revenue up 31% to $84.8 billion and adjusted earnings per share of $1.24, according to Refinitiv.

Bitcoin's terrible run isn't over yet



The cryptocurrency has fallen roughly 8% over the past 24 hours, according to Coindesk, and was trading near $33,200 at 4:45 a.m. ET on Tuesday.

Other digital currencies, including ethereum and dogecoin, also fell around 8% or more.

The value of bitcoin has tanked more than 40% over the last month during a torrent of bad news, including a move by one prominent former backer, Tesla (TSLA) CEO Elon Musk, to stop accepting the cryptocurrency as payment for cars. There's also increasing government scrutiny on cryptos in China and elsewhere.

It's not clear what is driving the most recent downturn, but there have been a handful of recent developments that may be making investors anxious.

Musk tweeted a meme that appeared to lament the end of his relationship with the cryptocurrency, causing bitcoin's value to sink on Friday.

And over the weekend, several social media accounts related to cryptocurrency were blocked in China — a notable move from a country that has in recent weeks widened its crypto crackdown by banning banks and payment companies from providing crypto-related services, and tightening regulations against crypto mining.

On Tuesday, the Securities Daily, a state-owned news organization, commended Beijing's ongoing focus on crypto, writing in an editorial that China has entered an era of "strong supervision" over the industry that is needed to guard against financial security risks.

Even former US President Donald Trump has knocked bitcoin recently, telling Fox Business on Monday that the currency "seems like a scam" that "takes the edge off of the dollar."

The Biden administration has also zeroed in on the lack of regulation in the crypto market, having recently unveiled new plans to tax bitcoin more heavily. The Federal Reserve appears to be growing more serious about exploring a potential digital dollar.

Experts have pointed out that ransomware actors use cryptocurrency to launder their transactions, and US authorities have called the misuse of cryptocurrency in such situations a "massive enabler." Such issues returned to the spotlight on Monday when the US Justice Department announced that authorities recovered $2.3 million in bitcoin paid to ransomware hackers who attacked the Colonial Pipeline last month.

The sell-off could worsen if bitcoin prices fall below $30,000, according to Jeffrey Halley, senior market analyst for Asia Pacific at Oanda.

Breaking below that barrier would "basically put every long position since January 1st in the red, which I believe, will trigger another capitulation trade," he wrote in a Tuesday research note.